“American Graffiti” Opens in 1973

American GraffitiAmerican Graffiti opened in the United States on August 11, 1973.  The movie, directed and co-written by George Lucas, captured a nostalgia for a summer in 1962.  I can hardly believe that now we are more than four times as much removed in time from the movie as the movie was removed from its characters.

American Graffiti follows two recent high school grads played by Ron Howard and Richard Dreyfus.  The two are spending their last night in town  before they are scheduled to leave for college the next day.  During the evening and night, their stories intertwine with a number of other young men and women cruising in cars around town. The movie not only captures a time and a place (and hot rods!), but it also reveals some of what it is like to be in high school.

The coming-of-age movie featured a number of stars and future stars, including Paul Le Mat, Harrison Ford, Charles Martin Smith, Cindy Williams, Mackenzie Phillips, Candy Clark, and Suzanne Somers.  Also, radio DJ Wolfman Jack makes a special appearance.  The film also contained a lot of great music from the period and a wonderful soundtrack.

Reception

Critics and viewers generally loved American Graffiti. The movie was nominated for five Academy Awards, including Best Director, Best Original Screenplay, and Best Picture.  The movie failed to win any Oscars and lost the Best Picture award to The Sting. But the film set in Modesto, California became a beloved classic.  It also aided the careers of many involved in the movie.  And it helped spawn a nostalgia for the 1950s and early 1960s.

American Graffiti ends with title cards reporting what happened to all of the characters, even though Lucas’s co-writers did not like such an ending, which was largely depressing. That, however, did not prevent an interesting but mediocre sequel in 1979, More American Graffiti.

When I was in high school, a few years after the movie was released, one of my teachers showed us the movie on a TV in class.  We were studying the period around the 1950s.  Our class was in the days before DVDs and VHS, so it was a big deal to see a commercial movie in class back then.  So, I will always have a special fondness for the movie.

In the clip below, Roger Ebert and Gene Siskel discuss American Graffiti for the film’s debut on television (starting at the 16:30 mark).  Check it out.

What do you think of “American Graffiti”? Leave your two cents in the comments.

  • Movie Lovers Should Join The Important Cinema Club (Podcast Review)
  • Siskel & Ebert Go Door-to-Door
  • Roger Ebert Keeps Us Thinking
  • Happy 70th Birthday Roger Ebert!
  • The Star Wars Holiday Special 1978
  • Trailer for Roger Ebert Documentary “Life Itself”
  • (Some related Chimesfreedom posts.)

    The Star Wars Holiday Special 1978

    Star Wars TV Special With all the buzz about the new film Star Wars: The Force Awakens, which continues to break box-office records, one is bound to think back to another holiday season affected by the Star Wars franchise. After the successful release of the original Star Wars film in 1977, the following November gave television viewers The Star Wars Holiday Special.

    The Special

    CBS broadcast the 97-minute television show on Friday, November 17, 1978 at 8:00-10:00 p.m.  The Star Wars Holiday Special centered around Chewbacca and his family celebrating Life Day, a holiday that happens to be a lot like Christmas.

    The musical-variety show featured many of the characters from Star Wars, even though many of the stars did not really want to be involved in the show. As Harrison Ford explained during a 2011 press tour: “It was in my contract. There was no known way to get out of it.” In the special, the movie stars were helped out by TV stars of the era like Bea Arthur, Diahann Carroll, Art Carney, and Harvey Korman.

    The Star Wars Holiday Special included an animated segment that is notable for showing Luke, Han, and Leia having their first encounter with bounty hunter Boba Fett.  The bounty hunter, of course, would later appear in The Empire Strikes Back.

    Below is the special.

    Reception

    Fans of the movie had high expectations for anything related to Star Wars.  So, they were disappointed with the Star Wars Holiday Special, including its low budget and its motivation to sell toys to kids. The special became pretty much universally reviled by everyone including George Lucas.

    Still, through the years, some fans have grown more fond of the show for its kitschy and nostalgic appeal. There is an entire website devoted to the TV show. And Mental Floss recently posted “An Oral History of The Star Wars Holiday Special.”

    Below is a 15-minute “best of” compilation from the special.

    If you still want more, you may watch the entirety of The Star Wars Holiday Special on YouTube. May the Force be with you through this holiday season.

    Leave your two cents in the comments.

  • Dogs, Star Wars, and the Bark Side
  • Weird Al Summarizes “The Phantom Menace”
  • Imagining a Modern Trailer for “The Empire Strikes Back”
  • Patton Oswalt’s Star Wars VII
  • All Six “Star Wars” Movies At Once
  • This Week in Pop Culture Roundup (11 Dec. 2011)
  • (Some related Chimesfreedom posts.)

    Ron Burgundy Enters the 1980s in “Anchorman 2” Trailer

    In the new trailer for Anchorman 2: The Legend Continues, the sequel to 2004’s Anchorman: The Legend of Ron Burgundy, we see that the famous San Diego news team led by Ron Burgundy (Will Ferrell) goes to New York City in the era of 24-hour news. The change in setting offers some promise that the new film will come up with some new laughs.

    The trailer reveals that key characters Brian Fantana (Paul Rudd), Champ Kind (David Koechner) and Brick Tamland (Steve Carell) return to the screen with Burgundy. Slate, which critiques the trailer, notes that reported cameos in the film include Kanye West, Tina Fey, Harrison Ford, Will Smith, and Nicole Kidman. Such an esteemed group ensures the movie will stay classy.

    Do you think Anchorman 2 can match Anchorman’s laughs? Leave your two cents in the comments.

  • Ron Burgundy Returns
  • Todd Packer Looks Back on “The Office”
  • A Web Series Says Goodbye to “The Office”
  • “American Graffiti” Opens in 1973
  • The Star Wars Holiday Special 1978
  • Paul McCartney Joins Springsteen for “Santa Claus Is Comin’ to Town”
  • (Some related Chimesfreedom posts.)

    “42”: Great Story, Good Movie (Review)

    Jackie Robinson Movie The previews for 42, the new movie about baseball player Jackie Robinson, tempted me to wait until the movie came out on video. I feared that the movie would not have much that I did not already know, and the preview made me wonder if the movie was going to be more like a made-for-TV movie. But I love baseball movies and Jackie Robinson’s story is worthy of the big screen, so I headed out to the local movie theater. While the movie may not rise to the level of the best baseball movies, it is still entertaining and worth your time in the theater.

    42 covers the story of how Jackie Robinson, played by Chadwick Boseman, came to break the code of Major League Baseball’s ban on black baseball players. The film does not cover all of Robinson’s career, but it covers his rise from the Negro Leagues through his first season in the Majors. Boseman does an excellent job of portraying the hero as a human being, and Nicole Beharie also does a great job of playing Robinson’s wife, Rachel. The most well-known actor in the cast is Harrison Ford, who in an unusual role for him, plays Brooklyn Dodgers owner Branch Rickey.

    Some have complained that writer-director Brian Helgeland focuses too much on the white men like Rickey. With no standing to defend the movie’s perspective, I do understand the complaint and would like to see a film that focused almost entirely on Robinson’s view. But 42 is trying to do something else by showing the historical context of Robinson’s great achievement. I also appreciated that Helgeland did not settle for showing stereotypes and that he featured some good people in the South as well as racists in New York.

    One minor weakness in the film is that it only shows Robinson’s first season, and it left me wanting more. So 42 suffers from some of the problems with biopics that can only cover so much time.

    42 also suffers a little from trying to fit into the baseball movie genre. Baseball films often end with an important baseball game win (or loss), and 42, like the recent Moneyball (2011), tries to fit in that genre but comes a little short because of real life. During Robinson’s first season in the Majors in 1947, his team did win the pennant and the movie portrays the climactic scene of Robinson hitting the home run to clinch it. But since the Dodgers won the division over the Cardinals by five games that season, it was somewhat lacking in drama. The movie does not follow Robinson into the World Series, apparently because the Yankees beat Robinson’s team four games to three. So reality took away a little of the traditional baseball climax, but, of course, the drama of 42 is really on Jackie Robinson succeeding when so much was against him, and the movie does a good job of telling the real story.

    The movie does do an excellent job of showing some of the difficulties that Jackie Robinson encountered from opposing players, opposing managers, and his own teammates. And you get to see the true strength of a man who had the courage to turn the other cheek for a higher cause (although not depicted in the film, by 1949 when other black players were established in Major League Baseball, Robinson could finally fight back).

    Conclusion: Overall, 42 is an engaging story about some things you knew about and probably some things you did not. It tells the story of a real hero and should be required viewing for every child in America. For a bonus video, here is Jackie Robinson appearing on What’s My Line? after he retired from baseball, and you can see at the end how he still speaks fondly of Branch Rickey.

    Other Reviews Because Why Should You Trust Me?: Rotten Tomatoes gives 42 a critics rating of 77% and an audience rating of 88%, which makes sense because fans may appreciate the true-life story and care less if the movie is too predictable. Jeffrey M. Anderson at Combustible Celluloid says that 42 is “a wonderful, huge, glossy, mythical portrait of America’s growing pains.” By contrast, Rick Kisonak at Seven Days concludes that Jackie Robinson “deserves a movie that strives to be at least half as great as he was, a movie better than a cookie-cutter Hollywood biopic like this one.”

    Bonus History Lesson: At the end of 42, Helgeland shows scenes of modern baseball players, starting with Yankee Derek Jeter for some reason, wearing Jackie Robinson’s number 42 on the annual Jackie Robinson Day. I wish, though, that Helgeland had shown a scene of the baseball player who actually inspired the idea of having players wear Jackie Robinson’s number on that day, Ken Griffey, Jr.

    How does “42” rank among the great baseball movies? Leave your two cents in the comments.

  • Jackie Robinson Takes the Field
  • Moneyball (Short Review)
  • It Wasn’t Easy: Sonny Brown’s Home Run
  • 4192: The Crowning of the Hit King (Review)
  • Kenny Rogers: “The Greatest”
  • What is that song in “Moneyball”?
  • (Some related Chimesfreedom posts.)