The Modern Prometheus Published

Boris Karloff On March 11, 1818, The Modern Prometheus was published, although the book is better known by the first part of its full title: Frankenstein, or The Modern Prometheus. Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley, the 21-year-old author, is credited with creating a whole new type of novel, blending gothic horror with science fiction.

The Book

Shelley began writing the book in June 1816 while staying in Geneva with her husband, the poet Percy Bysshe Shelley. Their friend Lord Byron suggested they each compose a gothic ghost story.  And Mary Shelley produced the classic we know today. Well, what we sort of know today.

I remember reading the book in high school and being surprised to discover that the book differed somewhat from the movies. In the book, the Monster’s creator Victor Frankenstein is tracking the Monster.  But “the Monster” can speak intelligently instead of merely deliver grunts as the character does in the classic films.

There are many elements from the novel that do appear in the movies.  For example, there is the Monster’s desire for a mate, and the story raises interesting ethical questions about the creation of life.

Few characters in a novel have inspired so many creations, from movies to TV characters to a cereal character, although many mistakenly call the monster “Frankenstein,” which is actually the last name of the scientist who created the creature.

1931’s “Frankenstein” Film

Actor Boris Karloff is most famous as the Monster, beginning with his portrayal in 1931’s Frankenstein, directed by James Whale. Karloff creates a sympathetic creature that is both scary and sympathetic in the way he is misunderstood.

The Frankenstein film had a dark sense of humor, but it also was a product of a director who lived through World War I. Different viewers find different parts more disturbing than others.

But part of the scene below was originally cut by censorship boards in some states.  They found the Monster throwing the little girl in the water (and accidentally drowning her) as too disturbing.

1935’s “Bride of Frankenstein”

Many consider the 1935 sequel Bride of Frankenstein to be even better than the original. Again Whale directed the movie, which again starred Karloff as the Monster and Colin Clive as the Doctor.

Elsa Lanchester defined the role of the bride in a brief scene. But many forget that she also played the role of Mary Shelley in the movie.

Universal Studios played on the popularity of Frankenstein and its other monsters by putting them together in different movies in the 1940s.  For example, there was Frankenstein Meets the Wolf Man, and various other films followed with mixed results. Some movies expanded on the subtle humor in the original films.

Funny Frankenstein

One of the most famous funny versions of the monster appeared in Abbott and Costello Meet Frankenstein (1948). Glenn Strange played the monster. The clip below from A Million Movies recounts “10 Things You Don’t Need to Know About Abbott and Costello Meet Frankenstein.”

One of my favorite versions of the Frankenstein story remains the Mel Brooks’ interpretation, Young Frankenstein (1974). The Mel Brooks movie is a wonderful funny tribute to the original film and its sequel while still being a great comedy in its own right.

In Young Frankenstein, Peter Boyle played the monster while Gene Wilder played the young doctor. Below is this movie’s take on the blind man and cigar scene from Bride of Frankenstein above.

The Frankenstein humor was taken to a surreal extreme in The Munsters.  In that TV series, the monster character was imagined as a father in a sitcom setting.

The Munsters originally ran on CBS on Thursday evenings from 1964 to 1966. In the clip below, Herman Munster tries out for the Dodgers.

Modern Frankenstein

In 1994, Kenneth Branagh directed and starred in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein.  That film tried to be true to novel’s plot while modernizing the scariness. The movie also starred Robert De Niro (as the monster) and Helena Bonham Carter.

Branagh’s movie, however, was a disappointment at the box office. I saw Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein in the theater and enjoyed it for what it was.  But it did not come close to the classic original films. Rotten Tomatoes gives it a 40% critics score and a 50% audience score.

Another 1990’s take on the story with mixed reviews was Frankenstein Unbound.  The 1990 film that combined science fiction and horror elements was directed by Roger Corman.  The movie features a scientist from the future, played by John Hurt, going back to the 1800s and encountering Mary Shelly and the characters from her most famous novel. (Thanks to Tony Fontane for reminding me about Frankenstein Unbound.)

Even though it is almost two centuries since the story was written, there will continue to be new versions of the Gothic tale. Many more folks today know the story of Frankenstein than know the Greek myth of Prometheus, who supplied the subtitle to Mary Shelley’s monster book (and a poem by her friend Lord Byron).

The Titan Prometheus stole fire from the gods and gave it to humanity. Because of this rebellious act, Zeus punished Prometheus by binding him to a rock, where every day an eagle would return to eat his liver, which would then grow back for the next day’s torture. Like Prometheus, Dr. Frankenstein stole something from the gods — the ability to create life — and because of that, he was a tortured soul.

Most recently, Paul McGuigan directed a new version of Frankenstein called Victor Frankenstein (2015). The movie considers the story from the viewpoint of the assistant Igor, played by Daniel Radcliffe. The film also stars James McAvoy as Dr. Frankenstein. The movie received poor reviews, but I am certain it will not be the last retelling of the story that Mary Shelley published in 1818.

What is your favorite version of Frankenstein? Leave your two cents in the comments.

Photo of Boris Karloff as Frankenstein in Bride of Frankenstein via public domain.

  • All of the Harry Potter Films Condensed Into One Movie
  • Understanding De Niro
  • Watch “Mel Brooks: Make a Noise”
  • Should You Hear the People Sing in “Les Misérables”? (Review)
  • “I’m Walking Here”: 25 Famous Unscripted Movie Scenes
  • Les Misérables Trailer
  • (Some related Chimesfreedom posts.)

    Should You Hear the People Sing in “Les Misérables”? (Review)

    Les Miserables The play Les Misérables is one of the longest running Broadway productions of all-time as well as an international phenomena. So, for better or worse, the film Les Misérables (2012), directed by Tom Hooper, is always going to be compared to that legacy. While some of the singing in the new film may not live up to major productions of the play, it is a worthwhile addition to the Les Miz canon and a fine way to bring a great story and exciting music to a wider audience.

    In the interest of full disclosure, while I have not seen the play 957 times, I have seen it a few times and have owned the soundtrack from the original London production. So I went into the movie with certain expectations. If you have similar expectations, you may or may not be disappointed, depending on how flexible you are willing to be in what you want out of the movie.

    Hooper’s decision to film the actors singing their parts live instead of lip syncing studio recordings was bound to result in less than perfect singing. The two major roles played by Hugh Jackman (Jean Valjean) and Russell Crowe (Inspector Javert) are the least spectacular in their vocals, generally singing on key but with less-than-powerful voices. Some, including singer Adam Lambert, have been critical of the singing in the film.

    Yet, any decrease in quality in singing from stage to film is more than made up for in the emotional power of skilled actors playing the roles on screen in close up shots that you do not get on stage. Hugh Jackman may not get a Grammy nomination on his own, but he more than deserves the Academy Award nomination for Best Actor and his Golden Globes win last night.

    Further, most of the other roles are played by excellent singers, including Anne Hathaway. Hathaway, whose mother was an understudy for the same role as Fantine in the first U.S. tour of the play, gives an outstanding singing performance, earning her a well-deserved Best Supporting Oscar nomination and a Golden Globes win even though she is only in a small part of the film. Hence, her vocal skills may be why her voice is the one featured in the trailer below on the song Susan Boyle helped make famous on Britain’s Got Talent.

    The actors in the important smaller roles help make the film. Colm Wilkinson, who played Valjean on stage in London and New York, here plays the bishop. Helena Bonham Carter and Sacha Baron Cohen provide comic relief as the Thénardiers better than one could do on stage because this comedy generally works better with small details you cannot see in a play. Samantha Barks gives a moving performance as Eponine, as do many of the youngsters in the cast. In short, those who are fans of the play, therefore, most likely will also enjoy seeing the story on screen and in repeated DVD viewings.

    Those who have never seen the play who do not have certain expectations about the songs may like the film even more than those with heightened expectations. Of course, some people will refuse to see the movie because they “don’t like musicals.” But those who are open to the experience will be pleasantly surprised how a powerful story can be told entirely in song.

    The film, of course, is based on Victor Hugo’s 1862 novel Les Misérables, which is a long but terrific story about life, forgiveness, love, faith, and hope. The story focuses on a former prisoner haunted by the law and the past despite the fact that he is a changed man. The book, musical, and film all touch on timely themes including a sub-story about a fight for economic justice. The world would be a better place if every human being watched or read this story at least once every year. The book has been made into a non-singing film several times, including a 1998 version starring Liam Neeson as Jean Valjean.

    Even though the play premiered in its English language form in 1985, it took more than twenty-five years for the musical to make it into a film. Seeing what these actors and this director accomplished, it was worth the wait.

    Conclusion? If you are open to watching a musical, or even if you are not, you likely will be drawn in by the combination of a great story with memorable music. If you have seen the play before, check your expectations and memories at the ticket window and just relax and enjoy the ride.



    Other Reviews Because Why Should You Trust Me?
    Rotten Tomatoes has a 70% critics rating and an 84% audience rating for Les Misérables, somewhat reflecting the fact that the play was always more popular with audiences than with critics. Roger Moore at Movie Nation notes the underlying economic themes of the film and says that the movie is one of the best of the year. Bill Cashill at Popdose writes, “aside from some budget-conscious CGI and the inherent, inescapable staginess of some of the material,” there was little that he did not like about the movie. By contrast, David Jenkins at Little White Lies claims the movie is “nut-smashingly awful.” Meanwhile, Forbes Magazine discusses the political and ethical themes about law and grace in the story. Finally, if you would like to see the stars of the stage perform the songs from Les Misérables, the entire Twenty-Fifth Anniversary Concert is available on YouTube. Note, though, it is a concert and not a full-blown stage production.

    What are or were your expectations of the film version of Les Misérables? Leave your two cents in the comments.

  • Les Misérables Trailer
  • A Crazy Violent Act and A Very Good Film (“The Dark Knight Rises”)
  • “The Grey” Is Not the Movie You Thought It Was (Missed Movies)
  • “The Ballad of Buster Scruggs” (Short Review)
  • The Unsatisfying Ending of Scorsese’s “Silence” That Is Still Perfect
  • The Modern Prometheus Published
  • (Some related Chimesfreedom posts.)

    Les Misérables Trailer

    Les Miserables Trailer
    The trailer for the upcoming movie, Les Misérables, has been released. As a fan of Victor Hugo’s book and of the musical who always wondered why it took so long to put the play on film, I am excited about the release, which stars Russell Crowe (Javert), Hugh Jackman (Jean Valjean), Anne Hathaway (Fantine), Amanda Seyfried (Cosette). Also, Sacha Baron Cohen and Helena Bonham Carter play the Thénardiers.

    The movie is directed by Tom Hooper, who directed the Oscar-winner The King’s Speech. In the upcoming musical, due to be released around Christmas, Hooper had the stars sing live for the filming instead of lip syncing the words to recorded tracks. That is Hathaway’s voice you hear in the trailer. I am guessing that Hooper’s attention to detail will pay off big in Les Misérables. Even if you do not like musicals usually, you might want to give this one a chance.

    What do you think of the “Les Misérables” trailer? Leave your two cents in the comments.

  • Should You Hear the People Sing in “Les Misérables”? (Review)
  • “First Reformed” Is a Movie For Our Time
  • The Modern Prometheus Published
  • Oklahoma: Brand New State — Gonna Treat You Great!
  • New “Man of Steel” Trailer
  • Full “Man of Steel” Trailer
  • (Some Related Chimesfreedom Posts)