Kevin Bacon Reprises “Footloose” Protest on Tonight Show

Footloose Tonight Show

On The Tonight Show, Jimmy Fallon announced NBC’s new rule banning all dancing. Coincidentally, that night’s guest was Kevin Bacon, who pulled out his moves from his Footloose days to stand up against the network’s dancing ban.

Is he able to change peoples’ minds about the ban on dancing? You will have to check out the video to find out. 2025 Update: Unfortunately, the video by itself is no longer available, but here is The Tonight Show appearance cut with the scene from the movie.

It is hard to believe that it has been three decades since Footloose opened in theaters in 1984. But the 55-year-old Keven Bacon shows he still has the moves (with a little help from a double). And he is a great sport here too.

What is your favorite Kevin Bacon movie? Leave your two cents in the comments.

  • The Terminator Pranks Fans
  • 19 Celebrity Cameos That You Might Have Missed
  • Jimmy Fallon is “Saved By the Bell”
  • “Serial” Parodies from Funny or Die and SNL
  • SNL Brings Together “The Hobbit” and “The Office”
  • Laugh of the Day: Real Audio for Beach Boys “I Get Around”
  • (Some related Chimesfreedom posts.)

    Springsteen’s “Spill the Wine”: Is This Just a Dream?

    Bruce Springsteen fans have noted that the singer has been making some interesting song choices on his latest tour. Recently, a friend directed me to Springsteen’s February performance of “Spill the Wine,” originally a 1970 hit for Eric Burdon (the former lead singer of The Animals) and War on their album Eric Burdon Declares “War” (1970). This February 23 opening performance at the Hope Estate Winery in the Hunter Valley of New South Wales, Australia was the first public performance of the song by Springsteen and the E Street Band. I am not sure there is a better song to open a show at a winery.

    “Spill the Wine” is one of those songs you have heard a million times even if you may not recognize the song’s name. The tune often appears in movies set in the 1970s, like Boogie Nights (1997) and Remember the Titans (2000), because the song sounds like the 1970s. You will recognize it once you hear the opening riff. It’s a cool song too, and Springsteen does it justice (with some lyric changes for the Australian locale), here leading into his own song, “Seeds.” Check it out.

    “Seeds” is about a family struggling to survive in the Southwest. As for “Spill the Wind,” you may read the different theories about the song’s meaning around the Internet. AllMusic, which gives its own interpretation of the song, notes that the song is so unique that few folks — like Springsteen and the Isley Brothers — have ever covered it. And, like a number of other one-off songs performed by Springsteen, so far he has only performed it once.

    Although Springsteen’s performance is a lot of fun, it is of course impossible to top the original. The first album of two collaborations between Burdon and War created this song that became War’s first major hit and Burdon’s last.

    What do you think? Leave your two cents in the comments.

  • Bob Seger and Bruce Springsteen “Shout” In Their Third Performance Together
  • Don’t Let (Badlands) Be Misunderstood
  • Bruce Springsteen Releases New Protest Song About ICE Protests: “Streets of Minneapolis”
  • 9 Thoughts on the “Deliver Me from Nowhere” Movie and Springsteen’s “Nebraska” Box Set
  • Who Sings the Gospel Song “Last Mile of the Way” in the Film “Springsteen: Deliver Me from Nowhere”?
  • “Under a Big Sky”: Digesting Songs on Springsteen’s “Tracks II: The Lost Albums”
  • (Some related Chimesfreedom posts.)

    Buy from Amazon

    It’s About Time to Watch “About Time” (Missed Movies)

    Domhnall Gleeson There are a number of reasons to give the movie About Time (2013) a chance, despite its somewhat generic title. The film is written and directed by Richard Curtis, who wrote Love Actually (2003), Bridget Jones’s Diary (2001), Notting Hill (1999), and Four Weddings and a Funeral (1994). While not everyone loves romantic comedies, About Time throws in a twist. In line with a trend previously examined on Chimesfreedom, the film incorporates a science fiction element where the science fiction element, with little or no special effects, is a mere co-star to help explore some interesting aspects of the human condition.

    Near the start of the film, a father, played by the wonderful Bill Nighy, tells his 21-year-old son Tim, played by Domhnall Gleeson that the men in the family have an unexplained ability to travel back in time in their lives to change their own past. Before viewers can get too excited about the time-travel concept, though, the dad explains that it is limited to the person’s life, so they cannot go back and kill Hitler, etc. With that limitation in mind and other “rules” we later discover, the rest of the film follows Tim trying to live a good life with his unusual ability to help his family and friends, including the woman with whom he falls in love, Mary, played by Rachel McAdams. As a metaphor for real life, Tim uses his powers much as the way we use our own power to live in the present.

    I will not ruin the movie by delving further into the plot (and if you are sure you are going to see the movie, skip the plot-revealing trailer below). But there are additional reasons to see the movie besides the clever writing and the interesting concept, which never comes close to overwhelming the real emotions of the characters. One reason the movie works is the engaging acting by Domhnall Gleeson. His occasional narration will remind viewers of similar narration by Hugh Grant in films like Love Actually and About a Boy (2002), with comparable phrasing and heartfelt insight. But, aside from the Hugh Grant similarities, Gleeson brings much more, adding some goofy humor from a man trying to figure out life. Gleeson, who lacks Grant’s leading-man looks, brings an everyman quality to the role. He interacts well with McAdams, but it may be his work with Nighy as his dad that provides the real heart of the movie. The movie features a fine supporting cast of other secondary characters that are well developed too.

    Because of the sweetness of the film is connected to a supernatural element, one is tempted to say the movie is a combination of Love Actually and Groundhog Day (1993). The comparison may raise expectations too much, but you get the idea. Even if About Time does not live up to those movies on your first viewing, it is one that has a chance to grow in popularity with repeated viewings once it starts running on cable TV. After watching the movie for the first time on DVD, I immediately watched it again, which is something I rarely do. And I continued thinking about the movie for several days, a nice respite from the majority of films that vanish from thought ten minutes after they end.

    In addition to the engaging characters, the concept of the film makes it re-watchable, as a viewer might analyze the logic of the film’s time-travel concept. Because of the number of questions that are raised by time travel that cannot be completely sorted out in a movie, I could not help thinking that About Time would make an interesting television series.

    There were other questions that a TV series might explore more. For example, Tim is a lawyer in the movie. While the movie does not tell us much about his work, someone does make a comment implying Tim has won all of his cases. That off-hand comment makes the viewer wonder if Tim used his time travels in the workplace, which would raise a number of ethical and moral issues. But the movie does not have time to explore them. What the movie does with the time it has, though, is explore the meaning of time, making the viewers think about their own lives. And, even if About Time is not perfect, that experience is a lot more than one expects from most modern movies.

    Conclusion? If you like romantic comedies and do not mind an unusual twist that may challenge you and make you think, then you should give About Time a chance. Maybe you will not like it, but then again, it might change your perspective on life.

    Other Reviews Because Why Should You Trust Me?: About Time is a movie that seems destined to be loved by a lot of viewers while being scorned by a lot of critics. Rotten Tomatoes gives About Time a so-so rating of 69% from critics while the movie gets a respectable 82% audience rating. Stephanie Zacharek at The Village Voice hated the movie, calling it “mostly dreadful.” Meanwhile, Joel Arnold at NPR enjoyed the film, concluding that About Time “blends genre pleasures with efficient, thematically resonant storytelling and moreover gives its audience a call to action.” Finally, if you get the DVD, check out the deleted scene involving Abbey Road that Curtis was sad to leave out of the movie (no longer available on YouTube).

    {Missed Movies is our continuing series on good films you might have missed because they did not receive the recognition they deserved when released.}

    What did you think of About Time? Leave your two cents in the comments.

    Buy from Amazon

  • End-of-the-World Movies . . . Without Special Effects
  • Missed Movies: The Man From Earth
  • Stephen King’s “The Life of Chuck”: A Few Thoughts for Those Who Haven’t Seen the Film . . . and a Few for Those Who Have
  • Nicolas Cage Shines In Modest But Surprising “Pig” (Short Review)
  • Jennifer Lawrence and Chris Pratt Travel Space in “Passengers”
  • Is “Captain Fantastic” Fantastic?
  • (Some related Chimesfreedom posts.)

    Charlie Brown Returns to the Big Screen

    Peanuts 3D

    It has been 34 years since Charlie Brown last appeared on movie theater screens, with 1980’s Bon Voyage, Charlie Brown (and Don’t Come Back!!). That drought will end next year on November 6, 2015, when Peanuts not only appears on the big screen but Charlie Brown, Lucy, Linus, Snoopy, and the rest of the gang will appear in 3D.

    Peanuts creator Charles Schulz passed away in 2000, but one of his sons, Craig Schulz, is a producer of the new film and Craig’s son is one of the screenwriters. Craig Schulz assures everyone that the new film will preserve and respect his father’s legacy.

    The plot is still a secret, but the movie will feature the beloved characters from the comic strip and TV specials, while revealing the famous “Little Red-Haired Girl.” The producers also promise that we will get to see Snoopy’s fantasy world in glorious 3D.

    Who is your favorite Peanuts character? Leave your two cents in the comments.

  • A Charlie Brown Christmas Reunion: Charlie, Charlie, Charlie, Charleeeee
  • “We’ve Got Another Holiday to Worry About”
  • When Is My Favorite Holiday Special or Film on TV?
  • What Comic Strips Influenced “Calvin and Hobbes”?
  • The WWI Christmas Truce: a Beatle, a Beagle, and a Brooks
  • (Some related Chimesfreedom posts.)

    Interview with Richard Fulco, Author of “There Is No End to This Slope”

    Richard Fulco Richard Fulco’s new novel, There Is No End to This Slope, is out today. We are excited about the new book from Fulco, who is the founding editor of the wonderful online music magazine Riffraf. The novel, published by Wampus Multimedia, tells the story of John Lenza, a struggling writer haunted by the death of a woman who was his best friend.

    Before we get to your upcoming novel, tell our readers a little bit about yourself.

    I’m a New Yorker who has a vehement love/hate relationship with his hometown. I moved (not very far) to Montclair, New Jersey but occasionally dream of moving back home. I’ve been a singer, electrical apprentice, high school English teacher and playwright. Now, I’m a father of twins, founder/editor of Riffraf.net (a music blog) and my debut novel There Is No End to This Slope is being published by Wampus Multimedia.

    That’s a lot on your plate. What made you decide to write There Is No End to This Slope?

    I never consciously decided to write a novel. In 2005, I wrote a bunch of poems and a one-act play that were based on a full-length play I had in the New York Fringe Festival. My harrowing experience at the Fringe was enough to send me into hibernation where I embarked on the novel, which took seven years to write. After two years of teaching myself how to write a longer work, I committed to the project and slogged away. I’m still not sure that I know how to write a novel.

    I think many writers would agree with you about the writing process. Where did you come up with the idea for There Is No End to This Slope?

    Have you ever consciously made a poor decision, knowing full well that the outcome would be disastrous? I made so many of them from 2002-2007 that it had become a lifestyle.

    I think that is a part of life and growing. From the description of the book, the novel seems to address some important themes about death and loss. Have any other books influenced how you think about those issues?

    A partial list of works that influenced the writing of There is No End to This Slope includes: Ernest Hemingway’s A Moveable Feast, Michael Thomas’ Man Gone Down, Frederick Exley’s A Fan’s Notes, Charles Bukowski’s Post Office, J.M. Coetzee’s Waiting For the Barbarians, Walker Percy’s The Moviegoer, Samuel Bekett’s Waiting for Godot and Endgame, Harold Pinter’s Birthday Party, Franz Kafka’s Metamorphosis and The Castle, Richard Yates’ Revolutionary Road, Joshua Ferris’ Until We Came to the End, William Faulkner’s The Sound and the Fury, J.D. Salinger’s The Catcher in the Rye, the poetry of Robert Desnos, the songs of Lennon and McCartney, George Harrison, Jeff Tweedy, Bob Dylan, Paul Westerberg, Jagger and Richards, Otis Redding, Stevie Wonder and Lou Reed.

    That’s a great list. And we have seen some of those artists discussed on your music blog at RiffRaf. Did your work on the blog influence There Is No End to This Slope in any way?

    I can’t escape music. It’s what sustains me. Well, a good book excites me too, but nothing gets my juices flowing like a great guitar riff or drum fill or lyric.

    The novel’s protagonist, John Lenza, played guitar for a short-lived band in high school. As an adult, his guitar sits in its case inside a closet, buried underneath boxes of his wife’s journals just gathering dust. Depressing, isn’t it?

    Yeah. Unfortunately, that happens a lot to musicians as they grow older and get overwhelmed with life’s other demands. I’m interested to see how it comes out in the novel. Where will we find the book when it comes out?

    Amazon and other fine stores.

    I look forward to reading it. Finally, I’m always interested in the writing process. While writing your novel, how did you balance other commitments? Did you follow a set schedule or work on the book as you found time?

    While I was teaching, I wrote mostly at night and on the weekends. When my twins were born, I had to be more flexible. I wrote in the morning, during their afternoon nap and when they went to bed.

    Thank you for your time Richard, and good luck with the novel. We look forward to reading it.
    =qf_sp_asin_til”>