Listen My Children and You Shall Hear Inaccuracies About Paul Revere

On June 2, 2011, while traveling on a tour of U.S. historical sites, Sarah Palin sparked interest in Paul Revere because of her claim that the famous rider warned “the British that they weren’t gonna be takin’ away our arms. . . by ringing those bells.” I suppose how one feels about her statement about Paul Revere — who actually rode to alert the Americans about the approaching British and who did not use bells — may depend on pre-existing feelings about the speaker. So, we will leave the debate about her statement and her continued claims t

hat she was correct to the political commentators and others, including those attempting to rewrite Revere’s Wikipedia entry. But the interest in the historical event is a good side effect of her statement.

Revere’s Famous Ride
Paul Revere Picture Book
Revere made his famous ride near Boston on the evening of April 18, 1775.  The British were on the move to seize military stores in Concord. According to the excellent one-volume history of the U.S., A History of the United States by Alan Nevins and Henry Steele Commager:

“Patriots were on the watch and a lantern in the tower of North Church flashed word to Paul Revere beyond the Charles River, who galloped off to arouse the countryside. The embattled farmers gathered at dawn with their muskets . . . There was a brief skirmish, eight Americans fell dead, and the Revolution was under way. Sam Adams was not far away, and as he heard the rattle of the guns, he exclaimed: ‘What a glorious morning is this!'”

To give Palin some credit, she did recall correctly that the ride was prompted by the British plan to seize weapons. I suspect some of her critics did not recall that part of the story themselves. Further, she is not the first to make historically inaccurate statements about the ride.

Henry Wadsworth Longfellow’s Version

In Henry Wadsworth Longfellow’s famous poem, “The Midnight Ride of Paul Revere,” he exaggerated Revere’s role by ignoring the other riders. And Longfellow’s poem inaccurately claimed that Revere made it all the way to Concord.  In fact, British soldiers captured him and took away his horse.

But Longfellow’s goal was to tell a tale about a national hero, not to teach history. Hence we have the term, “poetic license.” Still, the famous opening lines of the poem make it easy for one to remember the correct date of the ride:
Paul Revere and the Raiders
Listen, my children, and you shall hear
Of the midnight ride of Paul Revere,
On the eighteenth of April, in Seventy-Five;
Hardly a man is now alive
Who remembers that famous day and year.

Paul Revere and the Raiders

There is another famous “Paul Revere.” He was in Paul Revere and the Raiders, the band that had several hits in the 1960s and 1970s. Paul Revere the rider started out as a silversmith.  And the Raiders’ musician Paul Revere started out as a barber in Boise, Idaho. “Paul Revere” was his real name, although Revere was his middle name and his full name was Paul Revere Dick.

The band’s biggest hit was “Indian Reservation (The Lament Of The Cherokee Reservation Indian),” which was written by songwriter John D. Loudermilk. Mark Lindsay, the lead singer of Paul Revere and the Raiders, was part Native American and wanted to record the song even though it was released a few years earlier by Don Fardon.

During the summer of 1971, aided by Revere’s promotion of the song with a cross-country motorcycle ride, the Raiders version of “Indian Reservation” became the most popular tune in the U.S. and the biggest hit Columbia Records had ever released.

“Indian Reservation” also became the most popular song in my childhood home that summer, as my older sister purchased the 45 record and played it repeatedly. Some Native Americans used the Paul Revere and the Raiders version in their struggle for civil rights.

In addition to the version by Paul Revere and the Raiders, the song would later be covered by UK band 999 and be sampled in a Tim McGraw song.

The Cherokee

Like Longfellow’s poem about Paul Revere, the song by Paul Revere and the Raiders was based on historical events. In the early 1800s, Cherokee Indians lived around Georgia.  But as new pioneers came to the land with its fertile soil, conflicts soon arose. Although the tribes had built houses and settled in the area, the incoming white settlers desired more land.

In 1838, the Federal government ordered that the Cherokee be resettled in the western United States. The Cherokee were sent from Georgia and other states along with other Native Americans, including Creeks, Choctaws, Chickasaws, and Seminoles.

Many of the Cherokee died as they made the long trip.  They traveled largely on foot and by wagon, facing exposure, hunger, and illness. Because of the sorrow and death caused by the removal, the forced march to what is now Oklahoma became known as the Trail of Tears.

As Paul Revere and the Raiders sang, “Cherokee people, Cherokee tribe/ So proud to live, so proud to die.” In upcoming political campaigns, all of our politicians would do well to remember these parts of American history — and perhaps visit those historical sites too — in addition to taking pride in the the glorious stories like the one about Paul Revere’s ride.

What do you think about Paul Revere, the Raiders, the song, or the media coverage of Sarah Palin’s statement? Leave a comment.

  • American Revolution Begins: Don’t You Know It’s Gonna Be All Right?
  • Thanksgiving with Marty Stuart: Badlands
  • Gary Lewis and Jerry Lewis Together
  • Jim Thorpe, Great American Athlete
  • Little Big Horn and “Little Big Man”
  • Oklahoma: Brand New State — Gonna Treat You Great!
  • (Some Related Chimesfreedom Posts)

    Don’t Kill My Baby and My Son

    On May 25, 1911, a mob lynched an African-American woman and her teenage son near Okemah, Oklahoma. Through a direct family connection to the lynching, the acts that day would later inspire one of Woody Guthrie’s great songs.

    Oklahoma Lynching

    The lynching of the woman and her son occurred in response to the death of a well-respected white deputy sheriff, Goerge Loney. Earlier, Loney was investigating the theft of livestock when teenager Lawrence Nelson reportedly thought the officer was going for a gun and shot Loney. Loney bled to death.

    A posse then went to arrest the teen and his family, which included his mother Laura Nelson and her infant son. Lawrence’s father ended up in jail too.  But a mob eventually took the teenager and his mother Laura, who at one point tried to protect her son by saying she fired the fatal shot.

    It is unclear what happened to the infant, but the mob ended up hanging the teen and his mother from a bridge. According to some reports, Laura Nelson was raped before she was lynched.

    “Don’t Kill My Baby and My Son”

    One of the members of the lynching crowd was a man named Charley.  A year later, Charley would name his new son Woodrow after Pres. Wilson. Woodrow grew up to have quite a different view of the lynching than the participants. And Woody, as we would come to know him, developed political views that diverged from his father, Charley Guthrie.

    Woody Guthrie wrote the song, “Don’t Kill My Baby and My Son” about that lynching in Okfuskee County, Oklahoma. In the chorus, Woody chose to view the song from the standpoint of the woman who was lynched rather than choosing the voice of his father in the crowd:

    O, don’t kill my baby and my son,
    O , don’t kill my baby and my son.
    You can stretch my neck on that old river bridge,
    But don’t kill my baby and my son.

    Now, I’ve heard the cries of a panther,
    Now, I’ve heard the coyotes yell,
    But that long, lonesome cry shook the whole wide world
    And it come from the cell of the jail.

    Singer-songwriter Brooke Harvey, who is from Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia, recorded a beautiful rendition of Guthrie’s song:

    Harvey’s version does not appear to be available outside of YouTube, and there are few people who have performed “Don’t Kill My Baby and Son.” Apparently, Guthrie himself never recorded the song.

    But if you are looking for an album with the song, then Joel Rafael has a wonderful version of “Don’t Kill My Baby and Son” on his album, The Songs of Woody Guthrie Vol 1 & 2. Check it out.

    Although “Don’t Kill My Baby and Son” is not one of Guthrie’s most well-known songs, it is among his most heartbreaking. Besides being a great song, it documents a horrible injustice that we should not forget.

    More information about the lynching is in the biography Woody Guthrie: A Life, in a recent book on the history of capital punishment and the use of lynching, and on the Executed Today website, which includes the haunting photo of the lynching that was later used as a postcard.

  • They’re Selling Postcards of the Hanging: The Real Lynching in Dylan’s “Desolation Row”
  • Tell Me, What Were Their Names?
  • The Killing of “Two Good Men”
  • Woody Guthrie’s “Peace Call”
  • This Land Is Your Land: The Angry Protest Song That Became an American Standard
  • Woody Guthrie’s “Pretty Boy Floyd” Was About More Than an Outlaw
  • (Some Related Chimesfreedom Posts)

    Hands Across America: Holding Hands in May 1986

    Hands Across America

    May 25 is the anniversary of 1986’s Hands Across America. For those of you too young to remember, Hands Across America is something that people did before we had the Internet. Americans across the United States gathered to hold hands in an attempt to create a 4,125-mile human chain from coast-to-coast through seventeen states.

    They held hands for about fifteen minutes, sang the “Hands Across America” theme song (recorded by Voices of America), “America the Beautiful,” and “We Are the World,” which had been released a year earlier in 1985. And this event occurred in the days before we had hand sanitizer.

    Hands Across America,
    Hands Across this land I love;
    United we fall,
    United we stand,
    Hands Across America.

    Hands Across America

    Did it succeed? Well, the chain ended up with broken places in several barren areas. But millions of people across the country, including many famous celebrities, gathered that day for the event.

    President Reagan held hands in Washington, connected at least theoretically, to Texas migrant farm workers who organized a 51-mile chain in Texas. And we had celebrities. The chain included Oprah, Jerry Seinfeld, Jesse Jackson, Barbra Streisand, Rev. Billy Graham, Prince, Bill Clinton, Kenny Rogers, and Shamu the killer whale. There is even a book about the day.

    The event did not reach its goal to raise $50 million for the hungry, and the promotion costs were high, but it raised around $20 million for soup kitchens and shelters, while raising awareness about the issue. And it gave us something to do.

    Yes, I say “us” because I participated in the event. I was on a trip traveling through Arizona on that date with a group of friends. We had not planned to be in a particular spot, but when we saw the line forming in the desert (see photo above), we all jumped out of the vehicle and joined in the festivities.

    Everyone was friendly and happy for those fifteen minutes. As silly and cheesy as it was, maybe we should do it more often.

    See these people over there?
    They are my sister and brother,
    When they laugh I laugh,
    When they cry I cry,
    When they need me I’ll be right there by their side
    .

    Photo by Chimesfreedom. Were you there for Hands Across America? Leave a comment.

  • Sting Performs “Russians” in Plea to Help Ukraine
  • Kenny Rogers: “The Greatest”
  • Just Dropped In (To See What Condition My Condition Was In)
  • Ray Charles & Barbra Streisand: “Crying Time” (Duet of the Day)
  • Good Ole Boys Like Me
  • Christmas in Washington: A Song About Heroes
  • (Some Related Chimesfreedom Posts)

    Mary Surratt Arrest: The Conspirator (Review)

    Mary SurrattOn April 17 in 1865, Mary Surratt was arrested for conspiracy to assassinate President Abraham Lincoln. In 2011 on that date, the American Film Company released its first film, The Conspirator.  The movie is about Mary Surratt and directed by Robert Redford and starring Robin Wright, James McAvoy, Evan Rachel Wood, Kevin Kline, Danny Huston, and Tom Wilkinson.

    From a young age, we learn the name of John Wilkes Booth.  We know he is the man who shot Abraham Lincoln.  His chase and capture are recounted in the recent book, Manhunt (2006), by James L. Swanson.

    But the names of the others who allegedly conspired with Booth are less heard: Lewis Powell, George Atzerodt, David Herold, John Surratt, and Mary Surratt. A number of additional people were also arrested and convicted of crimes, including Dr. Samuel Mudd.

    Mary Surratt: “The Conspirator”

    The Conspirator centers exclusively on one of the more interesting accused conspirators, Mary Surratt. In doing so, Redford maintains focus in what might otherwise be an unwieldy long story.

    We may be curious to know more about the other conspirators and to spend a few minutes with Lincoln before he is killed.  But Redford keeps the story tight and aimed on the stoic Surratt (Wright) and her passionate lawyer Frederick Aiken (McAvoy), following Aiken as he struggles with his responsibility to defend Surratt.

    Currently on the Rotten Tomatoes website, the critics rating for The Conspirator is 56% and the audience rating is a much-higher 71%, which makes sense. The movie is not an exciting historical romp like The King’s Speech (2010), and the story is told somewhat conventionally. But it is an interesting story that audience members may appreciate more than critics, who might want a film that is more daring.

    Still, the fine acting and look of the film make it well above a History Channel special. All of the principal actors do a very good job (although Justin Long seems out of his time period even with the goofy mustache). And, as in Redford’s A River Runs Through It (1992), the lighting effects seem like another character, making for numerous scenes bathed in beautiful clean natural sunlight.

    The ConspiratorOverall, the movie is engaging and addresses a lesser known aspect of the Lincoln assassination. I will not reveal how everything comes out, but during the prosecution of Mary Surratt and even until today, there are still questions about whether or not she had any involvement in the conspiracy of which she was accused.

    Parallels With Modern Issues

    Others have noticed that the movie has some parallels to the modern debate about military tribunals. Kevin Kline’s Secretary of War Edwin Stanton spouts concerns that echo in our Age of Terrorism. Anthony Lane at The New Yorker believes that Redford belabored the parallels with today’s debates about military trials for accused terrorists a little too much.

    By contrast, I did not think the parallels were overdone. Instead, the movie would have been much more topical and challenging for viewers had it been released several years ago instead of in 2011. Just as more people spoke up on Mary Surratt’s behalf years after her trial, this aspect of the movie seems a little late too.  Yet, the issue is still topical.

    Another contemporary issue underlying The Conspirator is how innocent persons accused of outrageous crimes may be convicted or almost convicted of crimes they did not do. The Death Penalty Information Center website notes that since 1973, there have been more than one hundred people released from death row because of evidence of their innocence.

    Additionally, there are a number of people who have been executed with genuine questions remaining about whether they were innocent. One may debate the extent of the problem and the exact number of condemned innocent who spent years on death row, but the clear risk is certainly troubling. Even in civilian trials with our current constitutional protections, the innocent still may be convicted and condemned, and this realization has contributed to several states eliminating capital punishment in recent years.

    Conclusion

    Conclusion? Conspirator is a well-made straightforward drama about an important event in American history. Although it may not be one of the top few movies of the year, it is a period courtroom drama in a league with Amistad (1997) as less than awe-inspiring but nonetheless engaging, educational, entertaining, and worth your time.

    >

    What did you think of The Conspirator? Leave a comment.

    Buy from Amazon

  • American Tune: We Came on a Ship in a Blood Red Moon
  • Chronicling the Struggle for Justice in “True Justice: Bryan Stevenson’s Fight for Equality”
  • The Song That Played Over Carl’s Last Days Montage on “The Walking Dead”
  • Abraham Lincoln The Singer
  • A Hymn for Paris: “J’irai La Voir Un Jour”
  • “Westworld” is Coming to HBO
  • (Some Related Chimesfreedom Posts)

    Anniv. of Civil War’s Start: Elvis’s American Trilogy

    Fort SumterOn April 12, 1861, the first shots of the American Civil War were fired. In the early morning hours at 4:30 a.m., Confederate soldiers opened fire on the Federal Government’s Fort Sumter in Charleston Bay, South Carolina.

    The state of South Carolina had seceded from the United States in December 1860 soon after Abraham Lincoln was elected president. By the time he took office in March, the situation at Fort Sumter was nearing a crisis and seven states had seceded.

    Once the bombardment of Fort Sumter began on the morning of this date, it continued for 34 hours. And, on April 13 U.S. Major Robert Anderson surrendered the fort to Confederate General P.G.T. Beauregard.

    According to David Herbert Donald in the book Lincoln (1995), during the weeks between Pres. Lincoln’s inauguration and the first shots at Fort Sumter, the president was physically exhausted by stress. But there was some relief after this date. Because the first shots were fired by the Confederates, the rebels now had the burden of starting the war, not the North.

    And after the first shots of the Civil War, Lincoln’s choices became clearer. Two days later, Pres. Lincoln issued a proclamation calling for volunteer soldiers. Within a week, Virginia voted to secede, and more states followed. The war would rage for the next four years.

    Perhaps no song in recent history has attempted to encapsulate the Civil War era like “An American Trilogy,” a song that Elvis Presley performed regularly in concert toward the end of his life. The song was actually three popular American songs arranged by Mickey Newbury. It begins with the unofficial Confederate anthem “Dixie,” followed by the African-American spiritual, “All My Trials,” and closes with “The Battle Hymn of the Republic,” the Yankee marching song.

    What is the meaning of “An American Trilogy”? Paul Simpson’s The Rough Guide to Elvis notes that Mickey Newbury’s original intent is unclear, as the combination could have been about America’s lack of innocence or been intended ironically in reference to Pres. Nixon and the Viet Nam War.

    For Elvis, “An American Trilogy” might have been about patriotism. But Charles Reagan Wilson wrote in Judgment and Faith in Dixie (1997) that Elvis’s “slow, reflective, melancholy” performances of the song in the 1970s “suggested an emotional awareness of the complex past of regional conflict and Southern trauma.”

    In his excellent book Mystery Train (1975), critic Greil Marcus considered “An American Trilogy” to be Elvis’s attempt to combine all aspects of America and bring everyone together in a fantasy of freedom. But Marcus believed that Elvis’s song failed in that goal because the lack of complexity in the song creates “a throwaway America where nothing is at stake.” (p. 124.) For example, Marcus claimed, “There is no John Brown in his ‘Battle Hymn,’ no romance in his ‘Dixie,’ no blood in his slave song.”

    Maybe Marcus wants too much out of a four-minute song. Yes, the song is gaudy in its performance, and Elvis’s jumpsuit is a long way from the soldiers and slaves. But as discussed in another Chimesfreedom post, John Brown is inherent in “Battle Hymn,” just as the romance is inherent in “Dixie,” and as blood is inherent in the dying in “All My Trials.”

    There is another layer of confusion regarding the meaning of the song today because Elvis sings it. And Elvis, especially since his death, has become a complex American icon, as some consider him a revolutionary, some call him a thief, and some see him as a fat man steeped in excess. Yet perhaps the contradictions of Elvis, like the contradictions of the song, are the only way you can try to sum up the Civil War, in particular, and the complexity of America in general.

    Finally, one additional complication is that what Newbury and Presley apparently thought was an African-American spiritual, was not. Many today believe that the center of the trilogy, “All My Trials,” which is also sometimes called “All My Sorrows,” has somewhat muddled origins. Many current scholars believe that the song was assembled from fragments of existing songs in the 1950s and set to the music of a lullaby from the Bahamas to make it sound like a traditional spiritual.

    Newbury and Presley were not the only ones who thought it was an actual slave spiritual. In the 1950s, music critic Nat Hentoff wrote that it came from an African-American song, and in the 1960s, Joan Baez and others referred to the song as a slave spiritual.

    So, there are more questions in “An American Trilogy” than answers. But on a day that started the deadliest war in our nation’s history, I prefer the people with questions over the armed generals who think they have the answers.

    Bonus American Trilogy Version: For you Celebrity Apprentice fans, here is Meat Loaf singing “American Trilogy” at a 1987 tribute to Elvis Presley.

    What do you think is the meaning of “American Trilogy”? Leave a comment.

  • When is Mickey Newbury’s “33rd of August”?
  • 3 a.m. Albums: Elvis Presley’s “The Jungle Room Sessions”
  • Elvis Presley With the Royal Philharmonic Orchestra: “If I Can Dream”
  • How a Bull Moose, a Bear, and a Beetle Gave Elvis a Hit Song
  • The Civil War and Conan O’Brien
  • The Honored Dead and the Gettysburg Survivors
  • (Some Related Chimesfreedom Posts)