4192: The Crowning of the Hit King (Review)

pete rose 4192 hit king With Spring Training baseball games having started this weekend, one’s mind naturally turns to the National Pastime and childhood memories. My young baseball memories center around the Cincinnati Reds, and during that time I had several encounters with Pete Rose. In addition to watching him play baseball on television and in person, there were a few times where my friend David and I went to a spot in the Riverfront Stadium parking lot where we knew Rose would emerge after the game. He would always stop and sign autographs for us two kids, exchanging a few brief words about the game with us. On another occasion, I got his autograph when he and some other members of the Big Red Machine played a charity basketball game at a local college. Remembering how much fun we had getting those autographs makes me see some tragedy in the fact that Rose now makes much of his money signing autographs, including selling online memorabilia such as baseballs that say in Rose’s handwriting, “I’m Sorry I Bet on Baseball.”

I provide that background to show my bias in enjoying 4192: The Crowning of the Hit King (2010), which covers Rose’s baseball playing career with no mention of his banishment from baseball. I imagine the filmmakers wondering, “How can we make a film about Pete Rose without discussing his gambling?” And then one came up with the idea: “We’ll call it ‘4192’ and just cover his entire career up to his hit that broke Ty Cobb’s all-time hit record. We won’t even miss out on that much by not covering up to his final hit of 4256.” So, the movie avoids Rose’s gambling demons, with the only time betting being discussed is when Rose and teammate Tony Perez tell a story about betting on which one would be the first to use the bathroom in the new Riverfront stadium (Rose won).

So, the film is not a complete portrayal of Pete Rose or his career, and I concede that you cannot fully understand the man unless you see how his drive and determination drove him to dark corners as well as to great heights. But if you love baseball, you still might enjoy the documentary love letter to the sport and Peter Edward Rose’s playing career. No matter what you think of Rose, he always loved baseball and his enjoyment of the game comes through as he tells stories about his playing days, including how he came to be called “Charlie Hustle.” The tales are often funny and sprinkled with baseball stories about many greats, including Mickey Mantle, Enos Slaughter, and other players who played in Rose’s era.

The movie includes interviews with other players, but everything is one-sided by using players who are friends with Rose, such as Mike Schmidt and my favorite Red, Tony Perez. There are no interviews with players like Johnny Bench who are not close to Rose. And when the film discusses Rose’s confrontations with other players on the field, there are no voices from those other players. There are occasional unintended insights into the man, such as his story about his father refusing to stop to eat if the child Rose’s team lost. But for the most part, we only get Rose’s side of stories like his collision with Ray Fosse at home plate in the 1970 All-Star Game.

Perhaps because I have read several books that lay out the other side of the story, I was not unhappy to just relive the great moments on the field with some funny stories from Pete Rose and others along the way. If you are looking for a walk down memory lane in between the foul lines — and you do not care that this one movie does not delve deep into the troubled soul of the man — you might enjoy this one.  Then you should just grab a hot dog and a beer and watch 4192: The Crowning of the Hit King, which is available now for instant streaming on Netflix and on Hulu.

Do you think it is appropriate to make a movie about Pete Rose and not address his gambling? Leave your two cents in the comments.

  • Hammerin’ Hank
  • New Footage of 1919 “Black Sox Scandal” World Series
  • “42”: Great Story, Good Movie (Review)
  • Happy Opening Day!
  • Moneyball (Short Review)
  • Kenny Rogers: “The Greatest”
  • (Some Related Chimesfreedom Posts)

    Kansas’s Controversial Attempt to Make Toto the State Dog

    cairn terrier The Kansas Legislature is currently considering whether to honor Toto from The Wizard of Oz (1939) by making the cairn terrier the official state dog. But what initially appeared as a harmless piece of state legislation has stirred up controversy in the state.

    Although Rep. Ed Trimmer explained he proposed the bill to get kids interested in the legislative process, some have complained that the bill wastes the valuable time of the legislators. Still, eleven other states have passed similar bills recognizing various breeds of dogs.

    The real controversy has come from an issue raised by People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), who fear that the legislation will increase demand for cairn terriers and an increase in puppy mills that mistreat the small dogs. The debate has highlighted some other criticisms of Kansas laws that do not adequately protect animals. PETA also notes that there are a large number of dogs waiting to be adopted in animal shelters and suggests that if an official state dog is named, it should be “the humble, healthy, and 100 percent lovable all-American mutt.”

    Yes, a few states have official state cats. For example, Maryland has the calico cat and Massachusetts has the tabby cat, with both states recognizing a color of cat instead of a breed. Maybe Kansas could avoid the PETA concerns by choosing a dog color.

    Speaking of The Wizard of Oz, there is a funny clip from Sunday’s Academy Awards show that features a focus group evaluating the film. The clip includes members of the cast of Best in Show (2000) and A Mighty Wind (2003): Bob Balaban, Christopher Guest, Eugene Levy, Catherine O’Hara, Jennifer Coolidge, and Fred Willard.

    [March 2012 State Dog Update: The bill to make Toto the State Dog of Kansas died in committee. The representative who introduced the bill noted that he will probably try again next year.]

    Photo Courtesy of Mollie.

    What do you think about the proposed bill to recognize Toto? Who is the Wicked Witch in this debate? Leave your two cents in the comments.

  • Harold Ramis: The SCTV Years
  • Video of Every Best Picture Winner
  • 2013 Pawscars Award Winners Announced
  • The “I Shoulda Won” Best Picture Oscar Quiz
  • Pop Culture Roundup (for Early February 2012)
  • Weird Al Yankovic Joins Weezer in Video for “Africa”
  • (Some Related Chimesfreedom Posts)

    Oscars Show Snubs Best Song Nominees

    Man or Muppet Muppet Movie Jason Segel

    The Academy Awards show organizers have decided not to schedule the traditional musical numbers for the best song nominees this year. The Academy had already shown disdain — or disappointment — in the film songs this year by only nominating two tunes out of thirty-nine possible choices through a criticized nominating process. But now even those two songs will not get to take the stage. And we lose the chance to see Muppets singing on stage.

    So, you will have to enjoy the nominated songs elsewhere. One is “Man or Muppet,” featuring Jason Segel, from The Muppets (2011).

    And another is “Real in Rio” from Rio (2011).

    Which song do you prefer? Should the Academy allowed the songs to be performed Sunday night? Leave your two cents in the comments.

  • That Time George Kennedy Gave a Great Movie Its Name
  • Gary Cooper’s Three Oscars
  • Marlon Brando’s Lonely Oscar
  • 2013 Pawscars Award Winners Announced
  • Jonah Hill “Doesn’t” Let Oscar Nom Go to His Head (SNL video)
  • Dracula’s Lament
  • (Some Related Chimesfreedom Posts)

    The “I Shoulda Won” Best Picture Oscar Quiz

    Buy Oscar Academy Award While we anticipate the winners of this year’s Academy Awards, it is a good time to look back on the history of the Oscars.  This quiz will test your knowledge of some of the most controversial years.

    There are several years where a general consensus has challenged the Academy’s choice, for example many wonder how Dances With Wolves beat Goodfellas for 1990 Best Picture or how Crash beat Brokeback Mountain for 2004 Best Picture. But those are not the only years where many criticized the Best Picture award.

    See how well you remember those controversial choices. Answer these ten questions about which film won the Best Picture these years, where in retrospect, many believe another film should have taken home the gold statue.

    1. Which 1999 film won the Best Picture Oscar?






    2. Which of these 2002 films won the Best Picture Oscar?





    3. Which 1996 film won the Best Picture Oscar?





    4. Which of these 1939 films won the Best Picture Oscar?






    5. Which one of these 1941 films won the Best Picture Oscar?





    6. Which one of these 1994 movies won the Oscar for Best Picture?





    7. Which one of these 1962 films won the Best Picture Oscar?






    8. Which one of these 2004 films won the Best Picture Oscar?






    9. Which of these 1967 films won the Oscar for Best Picture?






    10. Which of these 1980 films won the Best Picture Oscar?








    How did you do? Which year do you think the Academy was most wrong in its Best Picture choice? Who will win this year? Leave your two cents in the comments.

  • Video of Every Best Picture Winner
  • Kansas’s Controversial Attempt to Make Toto the State Dog
  • That Time George Kennedy Gave a Great Movie Its Name
  • Gary Cooper’s Three Oscars
  • Marlon Brando’s Lonely Oscar
  • 2013 Pawscars Award Winners Announced
  • (Some Related Chimesfreedom Posts)

    Missed Movies: Another Earth

    Another Earth Another Earth (2011) is one of those movies like The Man from Earth (2007) that uses science fiction elements with little or no special effects to reveal some understanding of human existence. While Another Earth, now available on Blu-ray/DVD, will be seen by many fewer people than Transformers 3, it is the former movie that is more likely to linger in your memory.

    The film, directed by Mike Cahill, follows Rhoda Williams (played by Brit Marling, who also co-wrote the story), who causes a car accident with a family out for a drive. The accident kills the mother and child, but the father (played by William Mapother) survives. Around the same time as the car accident, scientists discover “another earth,” a planet that looks like earth that can support life and that is approaching our own earth. The film follows Rhoda’s grief at the harm she caused and her later encounters with the surviving father, while at the same time, more is revealed about the other earth, including the fact that it may contain another version of everyone on earth too. The film focuses on Rhoda, so that stories about the other earth come over television or the radio at various times in the background, but the two stories also intersect at several points, including when Rhoda enters a contest to be the first to go to the other planet. Through these stories and the possibility of meeting our doppelgangers, the movie raises questions about how our lives are created out of lost chances and choices made.

    The film divided critics and viewers, with some loving it and some hating it. On Rotten Tomatoes, the film has a 64% critics rating and a 69% audience rating. I can see why some would not like it, as the movie deals with depressing themes, and the movie moves a little slower than one would expect going to see a film with science fiction elements.

    Still, without spoiling anything, there are striking moments. And if you go into the relatively short 1-hour-and-32-minute movie with modest expectations like I did, you probably will be pleasantly surprised that the thoughtful meditation on life stays with you. An early scene in the movie shows The Foundation Trilogy books by Isaac Asimov, one of my favorite science fiction series of books that like Another Earth, makes one think about possibilities.

    Conclusion? Another Earth has little action and is far from perfect, but if you are in the mood for a subtle contemplative film about grief and loss and possible second chances, with just a touch of science fiction, you might enjoy Another Earth.

    {Missed Movies is our continuing series on good films you might have missed because they did not receive the recognition they deserved when released.}


    Other Reviews Because Why Should You Believe Me?
    : Roger Ebert liked the movie and gave it 3 1/2 stars. TribecaFilm.Com interviewed the director and praised the ending without spoiling it. Some critics, like Colin Covert at the Minneapolis Star Tribune, criticized the movie’s lack of science and plausibility. If you have seen the film and are looking for an explanation about some aspects of the movie, check out this discussion with the movie’s director and star on 109.com. Meanwhile, in science news, The Economist speculates whether there is a real another earth.

    Bonus Movie Music Links: If you enjoyed the music played on the musical saw in the film, it is entitled “Another Earth” and was written by Scott Munson and recorded by Natalia Paruz. Check out Paruz playing the Star Trek theme on the musical saw too.

  • Jennifer Lawrence and Chris Pratt Travel Space in “Passengers”
  • “Westworld” is Coming to HBO
  • Watch Sci-Fi Film That Promotes Real Rosetta Comet Mission
  • It’s About Time to Watch “About Time” (Missed Movies)
  • End-of-the-World Movies . . . Without Special Effects
  • Missed Movies: The Man From Earth
  • (Some related Chimesfreedom Posts)