Ed Harris Archives - chimesfreedom

In light of the fact that The Last Full Measure (2019) grossed only $3 million versus a $20 million budget, most people probably have not seen this film, making it s a movie you might have missed. Should you check it out?

There are some reasons the movie did not attract a large audience. When the film was released, it already was about a war that took place nearly fifty years earlier. The director Todd Robinson was not well known, and at times the production might seem like a TV movie rather than a feature film, with the starring role by a lesser known actor at the time, Sebastian Stan. While featuring some battle scenes, the movie is not really an action story about a battle, and viewers will already know who lived and died at the beginning. Further, the generic title of the film probably did not attract many viewers. Using an Abraham Lincoln quote from The Gettysburg Address that evokes the Civil War only confuses a potential viewer and tells them nothing about what the movie is about. Such a title could be slapped on any war movie (and is also the title of an earlier book about Vietnam). Finally, one reason that reviews were mixed might be that the title and the image on the poster seem to promise a movie set during a fight, most of the film takes place in Washington, D.C., years after the war has ended.

But The Last Full Measure, which took nearly 20 years to make from inception to final editing, is worth your time for two main reasons: First it is a rare film about the aftermath effects of war, doing for the Vietnam War in some ways what The Best Years of Our Lives (1946) did for World War II. Second, it features a number of great performances by many great actors, including Christopher Plumber, Peter Fonda, William Hurt, Ed Harris, Samuel L. Jackson, Diane Lane, Amy Madigan, and John Savage (whose appearance near the end connects the film back to one of the early great Vietnam War films, The Deer Hunter (1978)).

The Last Full Measure is based on a true story of the campaign to get a Medal of Honor for William H. Pitsenbarger, a U.S. Air Force Pararescueman during the Vietnam War. The film includes flashbacks to the battle where Pitsenbarger heroically saved many men. But the majority of the movie is set around the year 2000 where a Washington, D.C. official (Sebastian Stan) is assigned to investigate whether Pitsenbarger should get the Medal of Honor.

While much of the movie, including Pitsenbarger’s heroics, are true, many of the characters are fictionalized to varying degrees. The official’s story is very loosely based upon a real person and many of the vets are fictionalized versions of the veterans who worked to get Pitsenbarger the medal. But those differences do not take away from what the movie is really about. (For more on a comparison of the movie with the true story, check out this article from History vs. Hollywood.)

And what is the movie really about? It is about the effects of war on the survivors, beautifully portrayed by some great actors. I do not want to ruin the film for anyone who has not seen it, but only to suggest you give it a try. Is it a great war movie? No. But if you go in with modest expectations to see a movie about the effects of war on those touched by it, you might be pleasantly surprised that this movie you may never have heard of is a pretty good movie that you missed. You’ll see why so many great actors were attracted to these roles showing characters we rarely have seen on screen.

Leave your two cents in the comments.

The new space film, Gravity (2013), starring Sandra Bullock and George Clooney, is getting rave reviews. The movie about two characters who end up floating in space features great special effects, fine acting, and drama that will keep you on the edge of your seat.

If you have seen the trailer, you know what to expect. The movie does not waste time with a back story leading up to the accident, where debris from a Russian satellite destroys the U.S. space shuttle and sets Bullock and Clooney adrift. The rest of the movie features their attempts to stay alive and get back home.

Without saying more about the plot, the movie features plenty of action and drama, reminding me of Tom Hanks in Cast Away (2000), where a human struggled to get back to civilization and learned about himself along the way. Director Alfonso Cuarón, who also directed the wonderful Children of Men (2006), has a special eye for creating other worlds while still staying focused on character.

For a film set in space, Gravity is a very intimate film, with Clooney and Bullock carrying the entire story. Clooney’s character makes great use of the actor’s charm, and Bullock provides a solid center as a scientist who appears to be in over her head. We do, however, hear some other voices. As required for any movie about NASA such as The Right Stuff (1983), Ed Harris appears. Here he is the voice for mission control as he was for Apollo 13 (1995).

The movie is playing in both 3D and 2D. I had the unusual experience of getting to see part of the movie in both forms, as the theater made a mistake and showed my 3D audience the first 20-30 minutes in 2D and then, realizing its mistake, began the movie from the start in 3D. While, I still enjoyed the 2D version, Gravity is a movie where it is worth the extra bucks for 3D, as the shots of people and items in space, as well as the earth in the background, are spectacular.

Conclusion? If you like space movies or desert island adventures, you will enjoy Gravity. I do suggest you avoid reading many of the glowing reviews, as they may raise your expectations too high for a solid movie that has many traditional elements. Gravity is not as challenging as recent space or sci-fi movies like Moon (2009), Clooney’s Solaris (2002), or Cuarón’s Children of Men. But it is definitely worthwhile. I give the film eight chimes out of ten.