Bruce Willis Was in “The Verdict”?

Before he became a star, Bruce Willis was an extra sitting in a courtroom watching Paul Newman’s closing argument in “The Verdict.”

One of the greatest lawyer movies of all time that also features one of Paul Newman’s best performances as a down-on-his-luck alcoholic attorney is the 1982 film, The Verdict. Fans of the movie likely know that it was directed by Sidney Lumet and in addition to Newman featured standout performances from Charlotte Rampling, Jack Warden, James Mason, and Milo O’Shea. But did you know that Bruce Willis also appears in the movie?

Yes, Bruce Willis is in the The Verdict. But if you did not know, you probably do not remember him because he was an extra and had no lines. 

During Paul Newman’s closing argument, Willis sits in the courtroom. Watch about three rows back as Newman starts the scene. As the camera starts to pan in, Willis is high in the center of the screen.

Unfortunately, once you see the 27-year-old Willis in the scene, it is hard to stay focuses on Newman’s great acting. Maybe I should not have told you about it, but I had to share.

Three years after The Verdict, Bruce Willis would gain a more prominent role playing  David Addison Jr. in the television series Moonlighting starting in 1985. After a few film roles, his movie career took off following a starring role in 1988’s Die Hard. Like other fans of many of his films, I was saddened to hear of his retirement in 2022 due to an aphasia diagnosis.

Bruce Willis, however, is not the only future popular actor sitting in the audience as an extra in The Verdict. Just to Willis’s right in the courtroom (and in the photo above), you may also see Tobin Bell, who later became famous as John Kramer, aka Jigsaw, in the Saw movie franchise.

If you have never seen The Verdict, make sure to check it out, both to catch a glimpse of yet-to-be discovered stars and to see a great movie. The film currently has an 89% critics rating and 88% audience rating on Rotten Tomatoes. But maybe it would get a few extra points if more people knew about Bruce Willis.

Leave your two cents in the comments.

  • Happy Birthday Butch Cassidy
  • What Song Did Paul Newman Sing in “Cool Hand Luke”?
  • That Time George Kennedy Gave a Great Movie Its Name
  • Watch “The Education of Gore Vidal”
  • How Does Moonrise Kingdom Rank Among Wes Anderson’s Films? (Short Review)
  • What Holiday Film Featured a Kidnapping?: Christmas Movie Quiz
  • ( Some related Chimesfreedom posts.)

    The Lincoln Lawyer (Short Review)

    The Lincoln Lawyer, based on the book by Michael Connelly and starring Matthew McConaughey, is an old-fashioned legal thriller. The story follows criminal defense attorney Mickey “Mick” Haller (McConaughey), a criminal defense attorney who does much of his work out of the back seat of a Lincoln Town Car, as he takes on a big case representing a rich client accused of assaulting a woman. The movie also features Marisa Tomei, Ryan Phillippe, William H. Macy, and John Leguizamo.

    The Lincoln Lawyer Movies often depend on your expectations and mood. And if I were grumpier on the day I watched The Lincoln Lawyer or if I had high expectations, I might stress that there are some unbelievable points, and there might be easier ways for the lawyer to handle the legal ethics issues in the movie. Also, the movie features one of my pet peeves of portraying the bad guy as some sort of evil diabolical genius who would fit better in a James Bond movie than in a movie trying to be realistic.

    But those are minor gripes if you just want some fun entertainment. The Lincoln Lawyer is one of those movies where you just have to decide to roll with it. The story is fun, and, as he did in Time to Kill, McConaughey makes an engaging lawyer with a very good supporting cast. While The Lincoln Lawyer is not in the same league as law movies like Anatomy of a Murder (1959), The Verdict (1982), or even Tomei’s My Cousin Vinny (1992), it is a fun and interesting ride, like one of the better movies based on books by John Grisham or Scott Turow. In a recent interview, McConaughey mentioned the possibility of sequels following the further exploits of Haller. I would see the sequel, assuming I’m in the right mood that day.

    What did you think of The Lincoln Lawyer? What is your favorite lawyer movie? Leave a comment.

  • Bruce Willis Was in “The Verdict”?
  • The Missing Marine From the Iwo Jima Flag Photo
  • 12 Years a Slave (Short Review)
  • “Gravity” Is Such a Lonely Word (Short Review)
  • Bernie (Short Review)
  • Penn State Riots, Sports, and Life
  • (Some Related Chimesfreedom Posts)


    The Leopold & Loeb Trial and Alfred Hitchcock

    On January 28, 1936, Richard Loeb was killed in prison. Loeb was half of the infamous murdering pair Leopold & Loeb.  The two men and their crime inspired both the Alfred Hitchcock movie Rope (1948) and a later film, Compulsion (1956).

    In 1924, the media focused on the issue of the death penalty due to the high-profile crime and the “trial of the century.” Two young students from the University of Chicago — Nathan Leopold and Richard Loeb – were charged with the murder of 14-year-old Bobby Franks.

    The Crime and Trial

    It was a ridiculous crime. Leopold and Loeb were intelligent, but fashioned themselves as superior to everyone else.  So, they wanted to see if they could accomplish “the perfect crime.” They couldn’t. Police soon found them because Leopold had dropped his rare type of glasses next to the body.

    Clarence Darrow Clarence Darrow, the attorney for the two students, turned the murder case into a referendum on the death penalty after Leopold and Loeb both pleaded guilty. When the 67-year-old Darrow argued for the students’ lives, the local paper reported that a mob “fought like animals to . . . hear Darrow speak.”

    In Attorney for the Damned, Arthur Weinberg explained that several newspapers from around the country published Darrow’s twelve-plus hour plea in whole or in part. The attorney was successful. The two were sentenced to life for the murder and ninety-nine years for kidnapping, but no death penalty.

    After the Sentencing

    Loeb was killed in prison after nine years of incarceration.  But Nathan Leopold lived to be paroled in 1958 at the age of fifty-three. Leopold apparently was quite remorseful for the murder and tried to give something back to society.

    While in prison, Leopold volunteered to be infected with malaria for a study of the disease. After parole, he moved to Puerto Rico, worked at a church-operated hospital helping others until his death.  He eventually married and earned a master’s degree at the University of Puerto Rico.

    Alfred Hitchcock’s Rope

    Alfred Hitchcock’s movie Rope (1948), which was originally a play, has parallels to the Leopold & Loeb crime.  But the movie is highly fictionalized.

    Rope features two students who murder another student to show they are superior intellectuals. They hide the body in a trunk.  Then, they use the trunk as a table for a dinner party as a way to show how they are more clever than everybody else.

    The movie stars Jimmy Stewart as a teacher who attends the party. Do the boys get away with murder? I am not going to ruin it for you.

    Alfred Hitchcock filmed the movie in a unique style with extended takes between cuts.  Ultimately, though, he referred to Rope as a failed experiment. Jimmy Stewart was not happy with his performance either.

    Rope received mixed reviews. It also faced problems as some cities banned it for perceived homoerotic content. Today, though, many critics, like Roger Ebert, praise the movie and argue it is underrated, especially for the way the movie was filmed.

    Filmmakers do not make cheesy trailers like this one anymore.  The trailer for Rope features one of the actors in character talking directly to you about the movie. I wish they still made trailers like this one.

    The trailer for Rope sort of ruins the ending of the movie, so be warned.

    Compulsion With Orson Welles

    The movie Compulsion (1956), directed by Richard Fleisher, also was loosely based on the Leopold & Loeb case. In the movie, Orson Welles played defense attorney Jonathan Wilk, a character inspired by Clarence Darrow.

    Below is a video featuring the defense attorney’s argument before the court. Wilk’s argument is much shorter than Darrow’s 12-hour speech.

    Because modern movie directors think we have short attention spans, the 10-minute speech here is probably longer than you would see in most modern movies, which is a shame. As Darrow knew, it sometimes takes some time to tell a moving story.

    What do you think of the movies Rope and Compulsion? Leave a comment.

  • How Alfred Hitchcock made “Rope” With Only 10 Cuts
  • Bruce Willis Was in “The Verdict”?
  • Christmas Don’t Be Late
  • What if William Randolph Hearst Could Hack?
  • The Eyes of Alfred Hitchcock
  • Peter O’Toole and Orson Welles Discuss “Hamlet”
  • (Related Posts)